Smart technology and data collection are changing how teachers teach and students learn. While these tools offer exciting possibilities, they also raise important questions about privacy, fairness, and the human side of education.
What’s at Stake?
Think of AI in education as a double-edged sword – it can create personalized learning experiences and save teachers time, but it also collects information about students and makes decisions that affect their education.
Privacy and Security: Who Has Access to Student Information?
When your child uses educational apps or platforms, these tools gather information – from how quickly they solve math problems to their learning preferences. This raises important questions:
- What personal information are these tools collecting?
- Who else might see this information?
- How long is this data kept?
Remember the Facebook security breach a few years ago? It showed that even big tech companies can have security problems. That’s why many places, especially in Europe, have created strong laws to protect personal information in digital spaces.
Fairness: Does AI Treat All Students Equally?
AI systems learn from existing information—and if that information contains biases or gaps, the AI might not work equally well for everyone. This matters because:
- An AI tutor trained mostly on data from suburban schools might not work as well for rural or inner-city students
- A system that recommends learning resources might favor certain groups without meaning to
- One-size-fits-all approaches might miss important cultural differences in learning styles
To make sure these tools work for everyone, we need to regularly check them for fairness and make improvements when needed.
Who’s Responsible? The Accountability Question
When a teacher grades a paper, you know who to talk to if there’s a problem. But what about when an AI system evaluates your child’s work?
- Who do you contact if the system makes a mistake?
- How can parents understand why the AI made certain decisions?
- Who oversees how these tools are used in schools?
Many AI systems, including popular chatbots like ChatGPT, can’t always explain their thinking. This is why schools need clear policies about who’s responsible when technology is used in the classroom.
Keeping the Human Touch in Education
Technology should help teachers, not replace the important personal connections they form with students. The best teachers:
- Connect with students on a personal level when they’re struggling
- Teach critical thinking that goes beyond simple right or wrong answers
- Help develop social and emotional skills
Technology works best when it handles routine tasks so teachers can focus on these irreplaceable human elements.
Who Owns AI-Created Work?
As students and teachers begin using AI to help with assignments, new questions arise:
- If a student uses AI help for a project, who owns the final work?
- How do copyright rules apply when AI creates educational materials?
- What are the rules for using AI in homework and projects?
Avoiding One-Size-Fits-All Education
When algorithms recommend what students should learn next, there’s a risk that education becomes too standardized:
- Students might all receive similar materials rather than diverse perspectives
- The system might reward standard writing styles over creative approaches
- Unique learning needs could be overlooked
Moving Forward: Building Better Digital Classrooms
To make the most of technology while protecting what matters, schools should:
- Create clear guidelines for using AI and collecting student data
- Include parents, students, and teachers in decisions about classroom technology
- Be open about how AI tools work and make decisions
- Establish clear rules about who’s responsible for technology-related decisions
- Regularly evaluate both the benefits and potential downsides of new tools
The Bottom Line
Smart technology can make learning more effective and accessible for all students. But making this happen requires thoughtful attention to privacy, fairness, accountability, and maintaining the human connections that make education meaningful. By addressing these concerns directly, we can build digital classrooms that truly serve students’ best interests.
References
Abhivardhan. (2022, July 22). The IP Rights of Artificial Intelligence. Visual Legal Analytica, Indic Pacific Legal Research. Retrieved from https://www.indicpacific.com/post/the-ip-rights-of-artificial-intelligence
Anderson, J., Rainie, L., & Vogels, E. A. (2018). Artificial intelligence and the future of humans. Pew Research Center.
Bandura, A. (2018). Toward a Psychology of Human Agency: Pathways and Reflections. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 13(2), 130-136.
Bommasani, R., et al. (2022). Picking on the Same Person: Does Algorithmic Monoculture lead to Outcome Homogenization? Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 35, 20403-20423.
Espinoza, J. (2021, March 3). EU must overhaul flagship data protection laws, says a ‘father’ of policy. Financial Times. Retrieved from https://www.ft.com/content/b0b44dbe-1e40-4624-bdb1-e87bc8016106
Facebook. (2018, September 28). Facebook Newsroom. Retrieved from https://newsroom.fb.com/
Holmes, W., et al. (2022). Artificial intelligence and Education, A critical view through the lens of human rights, democracy and the rule of law. Council of Europe.
Jarvis, J. (2018, September 28). Facebook hack: What is the ‘view as’ feature that was exploited? Evening Standard. Retrieved from https://www.standard.co.uk/news/techandgadgets/facebook-hack-what-is-the-view-as-feature-that-hackers-exploited-a3948901.html
