Global AI Policies in Education: Key Takeaways and Implications for Ethiopian Education

1. Introduction: Navigating the AI Era in Education

Artificial Intelligence (AI) is rapidly emerging as a transformative force in education, holding the potential to fundamentally reshape teaching, learning, and administrative processes. Its capabilities range from personalizing learning experiences and increasing student engagement to automating routine tasks for educators, thereby enhancing overall efficiency and effectiveness within educational systems. The integration of AI promises to revolutionize how knowledge is disseminated, acquired, and assessed, offering unprecedented opportunities for innovation and progress.  

The rapid advancement and widespread adoption of AI technologies necessitate robust policy frameworks to guide their responsible and ethical integration into education. Without clear guidelines, the benefits of AI may not be fully realized, and significant risks, such as privacy breaches, algorithmic bias, and academic integrity issues, could proliferate. Policy development is crucial to ensure that AI serves human well-being and societal progress, preventing unintended consequences and fostering an equitable digital future.  

This report aims to provide a comprehensive analysis of leading global AI in education policies and frameworks. It will synthesize their key takeaways, identify overarching themes and divergent approaches, and critically analyze their specific relevance and implications for Ethiopia’s unique educational landscape, considering its ongoing digital transformation efforts and existing challenges. By examining international experiences, this report seeks to offer strategic guidance for Ethiopia’s journey in integrating AI into its educational system.

2. Global Landscape of AI in Education Policies: A Comparative Analysis

This section provides a structured overview of diverse AI in education policies from international organizations and key countries, identifying common themes and distinct approaches.

2.1. Overarching Principles and Key Themes Across International Frameworks

A foundational principle across nearly all global policies is the commitment to a human-centered approach to AI. This means designing and deploying AI systems that augment human intelligence, protect human rights, and promote sustainable development. Policies consistently stress the importance of ethical considerations, fostering critical judgment, and ensuring responsible use of AI in educational contexts. The pervasive emphasis on “human-centered” and “ethical” AI across diverse global policies suggests a collective recognition that AI’s power necessitates a strong moral compass. This is not merely about avoiding harm but actively shaping AI to serve human flourishing and societal well-being, particularly in education, where foundational values are instilled. The universality of this theme, despite diverse political and economic contexts, indicates that AI’s potential for pervasive impact on individual autonomy, privacy, and societal structures, including the perpetuation of biases, is widely acknowledged. Education, as a critical institution for shaping future citizens, becomes a primary area for instilling responsible AI usage and development. Therefore, policies are proactively embedding ethical principles to guide AI’s trajectory, aiming to prevent negative societal consequences rather than merely reacting to them. This signifies a global consensus on the need for proactive ethical governance in emerging technologies.  

There is universal recognition that AI literacy is a crucial skill for both students and teachers. This extends beyond basic digital skills to include understanding how AI works, its capabilities and limitations, its ethical implications, and how to use it responsibly and critically evaluate its outputs. This comprehensive understanding is seen as essential for navigating an increasingly AI-shaped world.  

Protecting personal and educational data is a paramount concern across all frameworks. This includes ensuring robust governance, transparency obligations regarding data collection and use, and compliance with regulations like GDPR. The sheer volume and sensitivity of data processed by AI systems in educational settings make robust data protection frameworks indispensable.  

A core objective is to ensure that AI benefits all learners, including those with disabilities and from diverse socio-economic backgrounds. Policies aim to prevent the widening of existing digital divides within and between countries, promoting inclusivity and accessibility in AI-enhanced education.  

Policies consistently highlight the critical need to equip educators with the necessary knowledge and skills to effectively leverage AI tools, manage associated risks, and integrate AI concepts into their pedagogical practices. The capacity and willingness of educators to adopt and integrate AI effectively are identified as a critical bottleneck globally. This consistent emergence of “teacher preparedness” as a significant challenge across diverse national contexts indicates that technological readiness is not merely about infrastructure but fundamentally about human capacity and mindset. This implies that even with advanced policies and funding, successful AI integration hinges on effective, continuous professional development and addressing educators’ concerns and digital comfort levels. The rapid evolution of AI tools means that traditional, one-off teacher training models are insufficient; educators require ongoing development that covers technical aspects, pedagogical strategies, understanding limitations, and managing student use.  

2.2. Diverse Policy Approaches by Region/Organization

UNESCO (Global Standard-Setter) UNESCO advocates for a humanistic approach to AI in education, aiming to accelerate progress towards Sustainable Development Goal 4 (SDG 4) by leveraging AI’s potential while ensuring inclusion and equity. It has developed comprehensive AI Competency Frameworks for Students and Teachers, outlining 12 competencies across four dimensions (human-centered mindset, ethics, techniques, and system design) to guide curriculum integration. UNESCO is also developing an AI readiness self-assessment framework to support Member States in evaluating their capacity to integrate AI. UNESCO’s role as a “global laboratory of ideas” and “standard setter” positions its frameworks, such as the AI Competency Framework, as foundational blueprints for countries, especially those in the Global South, to build their own policies. Their mandate is broad, covering education, science, and culture, and their “Recommendation on the Ethics of Artificial Intelligence” and competency frameworks are designed for universal applicability. This means their policy documents serve as authoritative guidelines that member states are encouraged to adopt and localize. For developing nations, these frameworks offer a crucial starting point, providing a structured and ethically grounded foundation for national AI in education strategies, thereby exerting a significant, though indirect, influence on policy development worldwide.  

OECD & European Commission (Literacy & Ethics Focus) The OECD and European Commission have unveiled a draft AI Literacy Framework for Schools, titled “Empowering Learners for the Age of AI,” which organizes AI literacy into four practical domains: Engaging with AI, Creating with AI, Managing AI, and Designing AI. This framework strongly emphasizes critical evaluation of AI outputs, understanding bias, and considering the environmental and societal impacts of AI use. The OECD has also contributed to an Ethical Framework for AI in Education, outlining the risks and benefits associated with AI’s use.  

European Union (Regulatory & Risk-Based) The EU AI Act stands as the first comprehensive legal framework for AI globally, adopting a distinctive risk-based regulatory approach. It categorizes AI applications into four risk levels, with education explicitly classified under the “High-Risk” category. This means AI applications in areas such as admissions decisions, grading systems, and assessment monitoring are subject to stringent compliance requirements. A notable prohibition within the EU AI Act is against emotion inference systems in educational contexts, aimed at safeguarding students’ fundamental rights. The European Schools Framework for Generative Artificial Intelligence provides highly detailed guidelines for the responsible, safe, ethical, inclusive, transparent, and effective use of generative AI. It emphasizes human oversight in assessment, strict data protection (fully complying with GDPR and the EU AI Act), and promoting critical thinking over reliance on AI shortcuts. The EU’s classification of education as “high-risk” and its detailed generative AI framework reveal a proactive and cautious regulatory stance that goes beyond mere guidance to legally binding obligations. This implies a strong belief that unchecked AI in education could fundamentally undermine human rights and pedagogical integrity. By explicitly deeming education “high-risk,” the EU signals that AI applications impacting fundamental rights (access, fairness, privacy, non-discrimination) require the highest level of scrutiny and robust safeguards. This sets a significant precedent, suggesting that developers and institutions worldwide, particularly those operating or seeking to operate in the EU, will need to adhere to similar rigorous safety and ethical standards. The detailed generative AI framework further illustrates the complexity of regulating specific AI types, moving beyond general principles to granular operational rules that emphasize human oversight and ethical considerations in practical application.  

United States (Incentive-Based & Workforce-Focused) The US approach is characterized by federal encouragement and incentives rather than mandates. The Presidential Executive Order on Advancing AI Education for American Youth promotes AI literacy, K-12 teacher training, and early exposure to AI concepts, with a strong focus on developing an AI-ready workforce. Implementation relies on federal grants, public-private partnerships, and the coordination of a White House Task Force. Despite federal initiatives, the US faces challenges in institutional readiness, with many universities lacking formal AI policies beyond basic plagiarism rules.  

United Kingdom (Pragmatic & Less Prescriptive) The UK government is ambitious for AI to improve education and reduce teacher workload, as outlined in its AI Opportunities Action Plan. It adopts a less prescriptive regulatory approach compared to the EU, building on existing frameworks for data protection, safeguarding, and intellectual property. Significant challenges include a lack of knowledge among educators, concerns about data privacy, algorithmic bias, the digital divide, and the absence of conclusive long-term evidence on AI’s educational benefits. The UK’s “less prescriptive” regulatory stance compared to the EU suggests a national strategy prioritizing innovation and flexibility, potentially accepting a higher degree of localized experimentation. This implies a trade-off between strict top-down control and fostering rapid development, which could lead to diverse outcomes and potentially faster adoption but also varied levels of protection and consistency across institutions. By building on existing legal frameworks, the UK aims to integrate AI without creating entirely new, potentially burdensome, regulations. However, this approach places a greater onus on individual schools and EdTech providers to interpret and apply these principles, which could lead to inconsistencies in ethical application, data protection, and safeguarding across the educational system, depending on institutional capacity and diligence.  

Canada (National Strategy Gap & Data Concerns) Canada urgently needs a national AI literacy strategy in K-12 education, as rising student AI use has led to concerns about cheating and unethical behaviors. The country faces a significant gap in AI training and literacy (ranking 44th out of 47 countries in one study) and suffers from insufficient support structures and fragmented provincial policies. Major data privacy risks are evident, as highlighted by a significant data breach affecting 76% of Canadian students using certain educational products. A multi-level governance approach (federal, provincial, school boards) is advocated to ensure equity, transparency, and accountability in AI integration.  

Singapore (Integrated & Efficiency-Driven) Singapore has adopted a highly proactive and integrated approach to AI in education, leveraging it for personalized learning through its Adaptive Learning System (ALS) and enhancing student engagement. AI tools are extensively used to streamline administrative tasks for teachers (e.g., Authoring Copilot for lesson planning, Short Answer Feedback Assistant for grading, Data Assistant for insights) and to provide intelligent tutoring, freeing up educators for more direct student interaction. The nation’s efforts are guided by a clear national vision, the “Transforming Education through Technology” (EdTech) Masterplan 2030. Singapore’s comprehensive and integrated approach, particularly its focus on AI for efficiency and personalized learning, positions it as a leader in practical, systemic AI integration. This demonstrates that a clear national vision, coupled with dedicated platforms and tools (like the Student Learning Space – SLS), can accelerate widespread adoption and deliver tangible benefits, offering a model for effective implementation. Singapore’s success appears to stem from a clear, top-down national strategy that translates into specific, well-funded initiatives and integrated digital platforms. This contrasts sharply with countries struggling with fragmented policies or institutional readiness. It implies that a strong, unified national vision, coupled with dedicated technological infrastructure and a focus on practical, scalable applications, are critical enablers for widespread and effective AI adoption in education.  

China (Mandated & Controlled) China has adopted a highly centralized and prescriptive approach, mandating at least eight hours of AI teaching per year for primary and secondary school students starting from Grade 1 (age 6). New Ministry of Education guidelines for generative AI (May 2025) emphasize age-appropriate use, risk prevention, and ethical considerations. Strict prohibitions are in place: primary students are not allowed to independently use open-ended generative AI content generators; students are banned from submitting AI-generated content as original work or using AI to cheat; and teachers are prohibited from directly using AI for evaluating students or processing sensitive personal data. China’s dual strategy of mandating early AI literacy while simultaneously imposing strict prohibitions on generative AI use reveals a highly controlled and centralized approach. This suggests a national priority on shaping AI development and usage from the ground up, ensuring ideological alignment and preventing potential misuse or over-reliance, which contrasts sharply with the more open or incentive-based approaches seen in Western nations. Mandating AI literacy from age six indicates a long-term strategic vision to cultivate a technologically proficient workforce and citizenry. However, the stringent prohibitions on generative AI, particularly for younger students and in sensitive areas like assessment, suggest deep concerns about academic integrity, the development of critical thinking skills, and potentially, content control. This reflects a state-centric approach to technological development and societal governance, aiming to harness AI’s benefits while mitigating perceived risks to social stability and educational quality, setting it apart from more liberal or market-driven policy models.  

African Union (Local Adaptation & Sovereignty) The African Union’s Continental AI Strategy identifies education as a priority sector for AI expansion, acknowledging both its potential benefits and inherent risks. A key philosophical underpinning is “AI with an African Accent,” which prioritizes local adaptation, technological sovereignty, and addressing specific regional challenges such as language diversity, existing inequalities, and teacher shortages. The strategy supports initiatives like AI-enabled assistive technologies, machine translation for local languages (e.g., producing children’s books in Bambara, a Malian language), and the development of culturally relevant educational content. It emphasizes the critical need to educate policymakers and develop national AI competency initiatives for both teachers and students to ensure effective and widespread adoption.  

Table: Comparative Overview of Global AI in Education Policies

Export to Sheets

3. Key Takeaways from Global AI in Education Policies

This section synthesizes the common threads and critical distinctions observed in the comparative analysis, drawing broader conclusions about the global landscape of AI in education.

3.1. Universal Principles and Shared Challenges

The consistent emphasis on human-centered AI, ethics, and responsible use is a non-negotiable foundation for all AI in education policies. This reflects a global consensus that technological advancement must be guided by human values and rights. This shared commitment underscores a collective understanding that AI’s transformative power necessitates careful stewardship to ensure it enhances, rather than diminishes, human dignity and societal well-being.  

AI literacy for both students and teachers is universally recognized as essential. This involves moving beyond basic digital skills to encompass critical understanding, ethical application, and the ability to interact effectively with AI systems. The goal is to cultivate a populace capable of navigating and shaping an AI-driven world responsibly.  

Data governance and privacy remain a top concern across all regions, particularly with the proliferation of AI tools that collect and analyze sensitive student data. Robust governance frameworks and transparency obligations are consistently highlighted as crucial to protect individual rights and maintain trust in educational systems. The potential for misuse or breaches of personal information underscores the need for stringent safeguards.  

The capacity and willingness of educators to adopt and integrate AI effectively are identified as a critical bottleneck globally. This includes providing adequate training, addressing concerns, and fostering a supportive environment. The consistent emergence of teacher preparedness as a significant challenge across diverse national contexts indicates that technological readiness is not merely about infrastructure but fundamentally about human capacity and mindset. This implies that even with advanced policies and funding, successful AI integration hinges on effective, continuous professional development and addressing educators’ concerns and digital comfort levels. The rapid evolution of AI tools means that traditional, one-off teacher training models are insufficient; educators require continuous professional development that covers not only the technical aspects of AI but also pedagogical strategies for its effective integration, understanding its limitations, and managing student use. Furthermore, underlying concerns such as job displacement, data privacy, and the integrity of learning can create resistance or apathy among teachers. This highlights that human factors—including training, mindset, and trust—are as critical, if not more so, than purely technological factors in ensuring successful and equitable AI adoption in education.  

Ensuring AI does not exacerbate existing inequalities and provides inclusive access to all learners, regardless of their background or location, is a shared goal, though achieving it remains a significant challenge for many nations. The digital divide continues to be a barrier to equitable AI integration.  

The rapid emergence of generative AI has necessitated specific policy guidelines addressing unique issues such as academic integrity, plagiarism, the potential for over-reliance, and the need for human oversight in assessment processes. This new wave of AI tools presents novel challenges that require tailored policy responses to maintain educational quality and fairness.  

3.2. Divergent Regulatory and Implementation Strategies

Nations like China and Singapore adopt highly centralized, mandated approaches to AI integration, ensuring widespread adoption and control. In contrast, countries like the US and UK prefer incentive-based or less prescriptive models, allowing more discretion to individual institutions and fostering localized innovation. This divergence in regulatory approaches suggests that national values, governance structures, and economic priorities significantly shape AI policy. This implies that there is no single “best” model, but rather a spectrum of approaches, each with its own trade-offs between fostering innovation, ensuring safety, and promoting equity. The differing regulatory strictness and implementation styles—such as the EU’s legalistic approach, the UK’s pragmatic stance, China’s top-down control, and the US’s incentive-driven model—reveal varied national philosophies. A less prescriptive approach, for instance, might be a deliberate choice to avoid stifling innovation with rigid rules, allowing for greater agility in AI adoption. However, this places a greater onus on individual schools and EdTech providers to interpret and apply principles, potentially leading to inconsistencies in ethical application, data protection, and safeguarding across the educational system, depending on institutional capacity and diligence. Conversely, highly centralized models, while ensuring uniformity and rapid deployment, may limit local adaptation and innovation.  

Different countries strike varying balances between fostering AI innovation and imposing strict controls to mitigate risks. For example, the UK’s ambition to leverage AI for efficiency contrasts with China’s comprehensive prohibitions on certain AI uses to maintain academic integrity and societal control. This reflects a complex interplay between national priorities, perceived risks, and the desired pace of technological integration.  

4. Implications for Ethiopian Education

Ethiopia is actively pursuing digital transformation in its education sector, as evidenced by the Digital Ethiopia 2025 Strategy and the launch of a five-year national strategy for the digitalization of education in March 2023. The government aims to leverage Information and Communication Technology (ICT) to improve the quality, relevance, equity, and accessibility of education for all, including refugees. However, the digital transformation of the Ethiopian education sector remains at a preliminary stage, facing several significant challenges.  

4.1. Leveraging Global Frameworks and Best Practices

Ethiopia can significantly benefit from adopting and adapting global AI in education policies and frameworks. UNESCO’s AI Competency Frameworks for Students and Teachers offer a structured approach for integrating AI learning objectives into the national curriculum, preparing students to be responsible and creative citizens in the AI era. This aligns with Ethiopia’s existing efforts to incorporate AI content into its ICT curriculum, though its integration into the K-12 ICT curriculum remains limited. The African Union’s Continental AI Strategy, which prioritizes education and emphasizes “AI with an African Accent” , provides a particularly relevant philosophical and practical guide. This strategy’s focus on local adaptation, technological sovereignty, and addressing specific regional challenges like language diversity and existing inequalities is highly pertinent to Ethiopia’s context. Initiatives like producing educational content in local languages, as seen in Mali, could be directly applicable to Ethiopia’s diverse linguistic landscape.  

Singapore’s integrated and efficiency-driven approach to AI offers a model for systemic implementation, particularly in leveraging AI for personalized learning and automating administrative tasks for teachers. While Singapore’s technological infrastructure is more advanced, its strategic vision for using AI to free up teachers for more direct student interaction provides a valuable blueprint for optimizing educational resources in Ethiopia.  

The EU’s risk-based regulatory approach, classifying education as “high-risk” , can inform Ethiopia’s development of robust legal and ethical guidelines for AI use in sensitive areas like admissions and grading. This emphasizes the need for stringent compliance requirements to ensure fairness and transparency in AI applications that impact students’ educational pathways.  

4.2. Addressing Existing Challenges in the AI Era

Ethiopia faces considerable challenges in its digital transformation journey, which will be amplified by AI integration. These include significant infrastructure deficits, inconsistent internet connectivity, and the high cost of digital devices, particularly in rural areas. Only 40% of schools have computers, and internet access is generally low, concentrated in urban areas. The digital divide between urban and rural populations is a major barrier to equitable access to technology-enhanced learning. Any national AI strategy must prioritize expanding and upgrading digital infrastructure, including broadband connectivity, to ensure inclusive access across the country.  

Teacher preparedness is another critical hurdle. Many Ethiopian educators remain hesitant to embrace digital tools, citing concerns about reduced interaction with students and a lack of adequate training in the pedagogical use of ICT. Global experiences highlight that even with advanced policies, successful AI integration hinges on continuous professional development and addressing educators’ concerns and digital comfort levels. Ethiopia’s Ministry of Education is investing in training for higher education instructors , but this needs to be scaled across all levels, focusing on both technical and pedagogical competencies.  

Data privacy and security are paramount concerns. As AI systems collect and analyze sensitive student data, Ethiopia must establish robust data protection rules and ethical review mechanisms. Learning from Canada’s experience with significant data breaches in education underscores the urgency of implementing strong cybersecurity measures and transparent data governance frameworks.  

The language barrier also presents a unique challenge. While Amharic is a working language, much of the content on the internet is in English. This necessitates a strategic focus on developing AI tools and educational content in local languages, aligning with the African Union’s emphasis on technological sovereignty and culturally relevant materials.  

Finally, the issue of academic integrity and over-reliance on generative AI, as addressed by China’s strict guidelines , will be crucial for Ethiopia. Policies must be developed to prevent students from submitting AI-generated content as original work and to foster critical thinking rather than dependency on technology.  

5. Conclusions and Recommendations

The global landscape of AI in education reveals a universal recognition of AI’s transformative potential coupled with a shared commitment to ethical, human-centered deployment. While core principles like AI literacy, data privacy, and teacher preparedness are common, regulatory and implementation strategies diverge significantly, reflecting varied national values and priorities. Ethiopia, in its pursuit of digital transformation in education, stands at a critical juncture where it can learn from these diverse global experiences.

For Ethiopia to effectively harness AI for its educational advancement, a multi-faceted and localized approach is imperative.

Recommendations for Ethiopian Education:

1. Develop a Comprehensive National AI in Education Strategy: Building on the existing Digital Ethiopia 2025 and the five-year digitalization strategy, formulate a dedicated national AI in education strategy. This strategy should align with the African Union’s Continental AI Strategy, emphasizing local adaptation, technological sovereignty, and culturally relevant content development. It should clearly define a human-centered and ethical framework for AI integration, drawing from UNESCO’s principles.  
2. Prioritize Infrastructure Development and Equitable Access: Accelerate investment in digital infrastructure, particularly in rural and underserved areas. This includes expanding broadband connectivity, providing access to affordable digital devices, and establishing public computing centers. Bridging the rural-urban digital divide is fundamental to ensuring inclusive access to AI-enhanced learning for all students.  
3. Invest Heavily in Teacher Capacity Building: Implement comprehensive and continuous professional development programs for educators across all levels. These programs should focus on AI literacy, pedagogical integration of AI tools, ethical considerations, and strategies for fostering critical thinking in students. Addressing teachers’ concerns and fostering a positive mindset towards technology adoption is crucial.  
4. Establish Robust Data Governance and Ethical Guidelines: Develop and enforce stringent data protection rules and ethical review mechanisms for AI applications in education. This should include clear guidelines on data collection, storage, use, and transparency, safeguarding student privacy and preventing algorithmic bias. Learning from the EU’s “high-risk” classification for education AI can inform the development of robust safeguards for sensitive applications like admissions and assessment.  
5. Promote AI Literacy and Critical Thinking: Integrate AI literacy into the national curriculum from early grades, focusing on foundational concepts, ethical implications, and critical evaluation of AI outputs. This should be age-appropriate, as seen in China’s tiered approach, while avoiding over-reliance on generative AI for creative tasks or academic integrity.  
6. Foster Public-Private Partnerships and Local Innovation: Continue to leverage partnerships with the private sector, particularly local tech startups, and international organizations to develop innovative, context-specific AI solutions and digital learning content. Encourage the development of AI tools that support local languages and address unique Ethiopian educational challenges.  
7. Pilot and Scale Proven Solutions: Implement pilot projects for AI-powered personalized learning systems and administrative tools, similar to Singapore’s approach, to demonstrate tangible benefits and gather evidence for scalable implementation. Focus on solutions that enhance teacher efficiency and student engagement without compromising human interaction.  

By strategically navigating the opportunities and challenges presented by AI, Ethiopia can leverage this technology to significantly enhance the quality, equity, and relevance of its education system, preparing its youth for the demands of the 21st-century global economy.

Sources

• UNESCO AI Competency Framework for Students:   https://www.unesco.org/en/articles/ai-competency-framework-students
• UNESCO Artificial Intelligence in Education:   https://en.unesco.org/artificial-intelligence/education
• OECD and European Commission Draft AI Literacy Framework for Schools:   https://babl.ai/oecd-and-european-commission-unveil-draft-ai-literacy-framework-for-schools/
• OECD Ethical Framework for AI in Education:   https://www.oecd-events.org/smart-data-and-digital-technology-in-education/session/0e517bba-c801-ed11-b47a-a04a5e7cf9da/the-ethical-framework-for-ai-in-education
• European Union AI Act (Implications for EdTech):   https://feedbackfruits.com/blog/from-regulation-to-innovation-what-the-eu-ai-act-means-for-edtech
• European Schools Framework for Generative Artificial Intelligence:   https://www.eursc.eu/BasicTexts/2025-01-D-65-en-2.pdf
• USA Executive Order on Advancing Artificial Intelligence Education for American Youth:   https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/2025/04/advancing-artificial-intelligence-education-for-american-youth/
• UK Government AI in Schools and Further Education Findings:   https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/ai-in-schools-and-further-education-findings-from-early-adopters/the-biggest-risk-is-doing-nothing-insights-from-early-adopters-of-artificial-intelligence-in-schools-and-further-education-colleges
• UK DfE’s Updated AI and Education Policy for EdTech Sector:   https://www.freeths.co.uk/insights-events/legal-articles/2025/dfe-s-updated-ai-and-education-policy-what-does-this-mean-for-the-edtech-sector/
• Canada Needs a National AI Literacy Strategy:   https://ca.news.yahoo.com/canada-needs-national-ai-literacy-152805594.html
• Canada AI in Public Education (CTF/FCE):   https://www.ctf-fce.ca/take-action/ai-in-public-education/
• Singapore AI in Education (Tech.gov.sg):   https://www.tech.gov.sg/technews/ai-in-education-transforming-singapore-education-system-with-student-learning-space
• Singapore AI in Education (theasu.ca):   https://theasu.ca/blog/artificial-intelligence-in-education-in-singapore-transforming-the-classroom-experience
• China Mandates AI Teaching (RDWorldOnline):   https://www.rdworldonline.com/china-mandates-eight-hours-of-ai-teaching-from-grade-one-us-executive-order-offers-incentives-instead/
• China New Guidelines for Generative AI in Schools (China Daily):   https://www.chinadaily.com.cn/a/202505/16/WS6826951fa310a04af22bfc2e.html
• African Union Continental AI Strategy (IDRC):   https://idrc-crdi.ca/en/research-in-action/commitment-action-advancing-use-ai-education-africa
• African Union Continental AI Strategy (“AI with an African Accent”):   https://profuturo.education/en/observatory/trends/ai-with-an-african-accent-education-inclusion-and-technological-sovereignty/
• Ethiopia Digital Transformation (Digital Ethiopia 2025):   https://www.eeas.europa.eu/delegations/ethiopia/digital-ethiopia-skills-and-tvet-action_en
• Ethiopia Relies on Private Sector for Digitalization of Education:   https://extensia.tech/ethiopia-relies-on-private-sector-to-accelerate-digitalization-of-education/
• Ethiopia Government-Led Initiatives to Transform Education with Technology:   https://shega.co/news/ethiopias-government-led-initiatives-to-transform-education-with-technology
• Ethiopia Challenges to e-Learning Adoption in Higher Education:   https://education.asu.edu/sites/g/files/litvpz656/files/2023-12/12-22-2024_J2_Embracing_e-Learning_PWFormatted.pdf
• Ethiopia Education Policy Technology (Education Profiles):   https://education-profiles.org/sub-saharan-africa/ethiopia/~technology
• Ethiopia ICT in Education Implementation Strategy (World Bank):   https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/bitstreams/60dcff91-766a-501b-900d-b343dd98671f/download
• Ethiopia AI in School Curriculum:   https://www.researchgate.net/publication/390257753_Artificial_Intelligence_in_Ethiopian_School_Curriculum_Educators’_Practices_Challenges_and_Recommendations
• Ethiopia National AI Strategy (Kemmcom):   https://kemmcom.net/ethiopias-national-ai-strategy/
• Ethiopia National AI Policy (Woglo Holdings):   https://wogloholdings.com/2025/02/09/ethiopia-ai-policy-review/
• UK-Ethiopia AI Forum (The Reporter Ethiopia):   https://www.thereporterethiopia.com/44660/
• Ethiopia Ministry of Education AI Guidelines (EBC):   https://ebc.et/english/newsdetails.aspx?newsid=11237
• Ethiopia Ministry of Education AI Guidelines (Impuls Radio Africa):   https://impulsradioafrica.online/ethiopia-to-enhance-education-quality-with-ai-integration/